However, it is not so obvious when comparing fractions. What are the techniques?
I. Comparing fractions with a common denominator
A. Rule
To compare positive fractions with a common denominator we simply compare the numerators.
More precisely: Where a, b, and c are three positive numbers and c is a number other than 0, if a < b, then (and, of course, if a > b, then ).
B. Examples
We want to compare and .
We know that 3 < 5, so .
We want to compare and .
We know that 2.5 > 2.3, so .
II. Comparing fractions with different denominators
At this point we are only looking at cases where one denominator is a multiple of the other (or where it can easily be reduced to this). We will study the general case later.
A. By reducing the fractions to a common denominator
To compare fractions with different denominators we start by reducing them to a common denominator. This means that we replace them with equivalent fractions that have a common denominator. So we can apply the rule from paragraph I.A.
To replace one fraction with another we use the following rule:
(where b and k are not 0).
Example 1: Compare and .
Note that: 8 = 4 × 2, therefore .
We have: (according to the rule from paragraph I.A), therefore .
Example 2: Compare 5 and .
We have: , therefore .
B. By calculating decimal approximations
To compare two fractions we can look for decimal approximations by using a calculator:
If we find exact values, comparing these values will give us the result;
otherwise we have to use values that are rounded to sufficient accuracy in order to reach a conclusion.
Example 1: We want to compare and .
Using a calculator (or by hand), we find that: and .
As 3.125 > 3.08, we deduce from this that .
In this example we have used exact values.
Example 2: We want to compare and .
Using a calculator (or by hand), we find that: and (values rounded to the nearest thousandth).
As 1.676 < 1.684, we deduce that .
In this example, we have used values rounded to the nearest thousandth. Values rounded to the nearest hundredth would have been inconclusive because and .